≡ Libro Free Supreme Power Franklin Roosevelt vs the Supreme Court Jeff Shesol Books

Supreme Power Franklin Roosevelt vs the Supreme Court Jeff Shesol Books

Download As PDF : Supreme Power Franklin Roosevelt vs the Supreme Court Jeff Shesol Books

Supreme Power Franklin Roosevelt vs the Supreme Court Jeff Shesol Books

In Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court, Jeff Shesol manages to do something rare: combine excellent research and a gripping narrative. (For those familiar with Rick Perlstein's Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus, I think the writing style and amount of detail are similar). The book deals with Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to pack the Supreme Court with extra justices in 1937 - an attempt that ultimately failed and, unfortunately, few people remember today. Shesol brings this important episode in our history to life.

First of all, Shesol resists the temptation of many historians to make the past prologue. He doesn't recite the whole history of the U.S. Supreme Court, nor does he stretch historical analogies to draw "lessons" or "comparisons" for today. Rather, Supreme Power stays focused like a laser on the subject of the book, beginning in 1932 with FDR's election. This allows Shesol to really delve into detail, spending almost all of the book's 530 pages on FDR and the court. (Incidentally, if you know absolutely nothing about the Supreme Court or its history, you might want to scan wikipedia quickly before reading this book).

And the detail in the book is extraordinary. I studied FDR's court-packing scheme in law school and read the major cases discussed in the book, but I felt I learned much more reading Supreme Power than I did in 3 years of law school. For example, I had read the Schecter case, which invalidated important New Deal legislation, but I did not even know about the businessmen and activists who formed associations, such as the American Liberty League, to launch test cases like Schecter. It turns out the Schecter brothers even voted for FDR in the 1936 elections! Another fascinating trivia bit revealed early in the book is that the whole issue almost became moot because Justices Sutherland and Van Devanter almost retired in 1932 - but refused to do so when Congress lowered their pensions.

Shesol also strives - and for the most part achieves - the ideal of historical objectivity (pay the reviewer who claims Shesol is sympathetic to FDR no heed). He is quite willing to point out the flaws of the New Deal and the fact that it wasn't universally popular (raising concerns similar to Amity Shales' The Forgotten Man). He also seeks to uncover the ulterior motivations of men like Senator Burton K. Wheeler (against court-packing) and Joe Robinson (for).

However - and this I found remarkable - Shesol also tries to understand the logic and motivations behind the court-packing plan itself. All too often, historians deride the plan as a mistake or doomed to fail. Yet, Shesol shows that the plan did in fact have an organic history and genesis of its own. He discusses the longstanding concern that many observers, including former president and chief justice Taft, had regarding judges over the age of 70. In fact, FDR's chief foe on the Supreme Court, arch-conservative Justice McReynolds, proposed a similar plan during the Wilson administration. In short, Shesol shows readers the type of information bombarding the White House about elder judges, as well as how FDR and his advisors could convince themselves that adding additional judges for each over the age of 70 was a brilliant solution.

My one complaint - and it is a small one - is that Shesol does not seem to make much use of the political science literature about courts and judicial review. This is a shame. I think political science offers many compelling explanations about why elites would oppose limits on judicial review. For example, Tom Ginsburg's Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases advances the theory that elites view judicial review as important to protect themselves if they ever become relegated to minority status (for example, Republicans becoming the minority party in Congress). Some of these theories can be found in some form in Supreme Power, but Shesol, who is primarily a historian, primarily credits the political dynamics of the 1930s for defeating FDR's plan rather than larger political and institutional forces.

Supreme Power will probably become the primary account of FDR's court-packing scheme for some time. Highly recommended for anybody interested in American history or the politics of courts.


Tags : Amazon.com: Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court (9780393064742): Jeff Shesol: Books,Jeff Shesol,Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court,W. W. Norton & Company,0393064743,Legal History,Law;Political aspects;History.,Political questions and judicial power;United States;History;20th century.,United States;Politics and government;20th century.,20th century,American Government - Executive Branch,BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY Presidents & Heads of State,Courts - General,GENERAL,General Adult,HISTORY Modern 20th Century,HISTORY United States 20th Century,HISTORY United States General,History,History - U.S.,HistoryAmerican,History: American,LAW Constitutional,LAW Legal History,LawCourts - General,Legal aspects,Non-Fiction,POLITICAL SCIENCE American Government Judicial Branch,Political ScienceAmerican Government - Executive Branch,Political questions and judicial power,Politics & government,Politics and government,Supreme Court,U.S. HISTORY - 20TH CENTURY (GENERAL),U.S. PRESIDENT,United States,United States - 20th Century,United States.,United States;Politics and government;20th century.,American Government - Executive Branch,BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY Presidents & Heads of State,Courts - General,HISTORY Modern 20th Century,HISTORY United States 20th Century,HISTORY United States General,LAW Constitutional,LAW Legal History,LawCourts - General,POLITICAL SCIENCE American Government Judicial Branch,Political ScienceAmerican Government - Executive Branch,United States - 20th Century,History - U.S.,20th century,Political questions and judicial power,Politics and government,Supreme Court,United States,United States.,U.S. History - 20th Century (General),History,History: American,Politics & government

Supreme Power Franklin Roosevelt vs the Supreme Court Jeff Shesol Books Reviews

Jeff Shesol wrote a landmark book about the Supreme Court. He is a good historian who backs up his writing with detailed endnotes.

A very detailed analysis of the events relating to FDR's response to a Supreme Court that turned itself into a legislative body by repeatedly invalidating legislation that it did not like. Owen Roberts & Chief Justice Hughes realized how the Four Horsemen were undermining the authority of and respect for the Court & made a switch in time that saved the Court. Hughes beat FDR in the political arena. This book gives a better understanding of today's events.

Chief Justice Roberts also attempted to depoliticize the Supreme Court by not invalidating the Affordable Care Act. HISTORY REPEATS.
For those interested in FDR, the New Deal, the Supreme Court, or the Constitutional Revolution of 1937, this is a great book. I have been studying this period in constitutional law for quite some time, and in such a study, one tends to find things not found in average articles or books on the subject. I found almost all of the little side stories not in most books covering the subject. Kudos to the authors for some really fine work.

This book has a very good companion too. That book is entitled FDR v. The Constitution The Court-Packing Fight and the Triumph of Democracy. Both books contain a few things not in the other, and FDR v. The Constitution is a shorter book. I recommend you read it first, and if it whets your appetite, read Supreme Power to learn even more from a slightly different perspective.FDR V. the Constitution The Court-Packing Fight and the Triumph of Democracy [FDR V THE CONSTITUTION COLLECT]
This book is a monumental study of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's attempt to "pack the court." No stone or relevant aspect is left unturned. The book is very long, but very well narrated and very engaging. It is very well balanced between the positive and the negative aspects of FDR's attempt. It is best read/listened to by serious students of history. It is not a light book and requires serious reading/listening. It is graduate level material and not for the casual reader.
In Supreme Power Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court, Jeff Shesol manages to do something rare combine excellent research and a gripping narrative. (For those familiar with Rick Perlstein's Before the Storm Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus, I think the writing style and amount of detail are similar). The book deals with Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to pack the Supreme Court with extra justices in 1937 - an attempt that ultimately failed and, unfortunately, few people remember today. Shesol brings this important episode in our history to life.

First of all, Shesol resists the temptation of many historians to make the past prologue. He doesn't recite the whole history of the U.S. Supreme Court, nor does he stretch historical analogies to draw "lessons" or "comparisons" for today. Rather, Supreme Power stays focused like a laser on the subject of the book, beginning in 1932 with FDR's election. This allows Shesol to really delve into detail, spending almost all of the book's 530 pages on FDR and the court. (Incidentally, if you know absolutely nothing about the Supreme Court or its history, you might want to scan wikipedia quickly before reading this book).

And the detail in the book is extraordinary. I studied FDR's court-packing scheme in law school and read the major cases discussed in the book, but I felt I learned much more reading Supreme Power than I did in 3 years of law school. For example, I had read the Schecter case, which invalidated important New Deal legislation, but I did not even know about the businessmen and activists who formed associations, such as the American Liberty League, to launch test cases like Schecter. It turns out the Schecter brothers even voted for FDR in the 1936 elections! Another fascinating trivia bit revealed early in the book is that the whole issue almost became moot because Justices Sutherland and Van Devanter almost retired in 1932 - but refused to do so when Congress lowered their pensions.

Shesol also strives - and for the most part achieves - the ideal of historical objectivity (pay the reviewer who claims Shesol is sympathetic to FDR no heed). He is quite willing to point out the flaws of the New Deal and the fact that it wasn't universally popular (raising concerns similar to Amity Shales' The Forgotten Man). He also seeks to uncover the ulterior motivations of men like Senator Burton K. Wheeler (against court-packing) and Joe Robinson (for).

However - and this I found remarkable - Shesol also tries to understand the logic and motivations behind the court-packing plan itself. All too often, historians deride the plan as a mistake or doomed to fail. Yet, Shesol shows that the plan did in fact have an organic history and genesis of its own. He discusses the longstanding concern that many observers, including former president and chief justice Taft, had regarding judges over the age of 70. In fact, FDR's chief foe on the Supreme Court, arch-conservative Justice McReynolds, proposed a similar plan during the Wilson administration. In short, Shesol shows readers the type of information bombarding the White House about elder judges, as well as how FDR and his advisors could convince themselves that adding additional judges for each over the age of 70 was a brilliant solution.

My one complaint - and it is a small one - is that Shesol does not seem to make much use of the political science literature about courts and judicial review. This is a shame. I think political science offers many compelling explanations about why elites would oppose limits on judicial review. For example, Tom Ginsburg's Judicial Review in New Democracies Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases advances the theory that elites view judicial review as important to protect themselves if they ever become relegated to minority status (for example, Republicans becoming the minority party in Congress). Some of these theories can be found in some form in Supreme Power, but Shesol, who is primarily a historian, primarily credits the political dynamics of the 1930s for defeating FDR's plan rather than larger political and institutional forces.

Supreme Power will probably become the primary account of FDR's court-packing scheme for some time. Highly recommended for anybody interested in American history or the politics of courts.